Skip to Main Content Custom Header
Western Washington University. Make waves.
Western Libraries

SOC 302 Classical Sociological Theory

Rhetorical Moves

Rhetorical "Moves"

 

Here are several "moves" that you can make, along with example phrases that tell your reader which move you’re using.     

 

Grounding: Situating a claim within a particular context

·         Defining: Scholars A, B, and C define Concept X as [paraphrase of concept].

·         Framing: Historically, scholars have examined [concept] through [identify a lens or theoretical framework].

·         Illustrating: We can look to Scholar D, who illustrates many of the complexities embedded in Concept X.

·         Authorizing: Scholar C echoes what I’ve argued for, saying that [quote or paraphrase of claim].

 

Forwarding: Extending or re-purposing the ideas or expertise of others between contexts

·         Borrowing: Although Scholar C exclusively focused on [original context], the same idea can be applied to [context of subquestion].

·         Extending: While I agree with Scholar A’s main premise, I would argue that A does not go far enough and that [new idea].

·         Synthesizing: Scholars A, B, and C offer similar insights, Scholars D and E go against the grain, and Scholar F offers an entirely new explanation. Taking these valuable perspectives collectively, I conclude that [new perspective].

 

Countering: Presenting alternative perspectives or uncovering gaps in others' views

·         Arguing another side: However, Scholar A seems to have overlooked [present alternative perspective].

·         Uncovering values: If Scholars A and B had also taken [gap in thinking] into consideration, they may have reached a different conclusion.

Rhetorical "Moves"

 

Here are several "moves" that you can make, along with example phrases that tell your reader which move you’re using.     

 

Grounding: Situating a claim within a particular context

·         Defining: Scholars A, B, and C define Concept X as [paraphrase of concept].

·         Framing: Historically, scholars have examined [concept] through [identify a lens or theoretical framework].

·         Illustrating: We can look to Scholar D, who illustrates many of the complexities embedded in Concept X.

·         Authorizing: Scholar C echoes what I’ve argued for, saying that [quote or paraphrase of claim].

 

Forwarding: Extending or re-purposing the ideas or expertise of others between contexts

·         Borrowing: Although Scholar C exclusively focused on [original context], the same idea can be applied to [context of subquestion].

·         Extending: While I agree with Scholar A’s main premise, I would argue that A does not go far enough and that [new idea].

·         Synthesizing: Scholars A, B, and C offer similar insights, Scholars D and E go against the grain, and Scholar F offers an entirely new explanation. Taking these valuable perspectives collectively, I conclude that [new perspective].

 

Countering: Presenting alternative perspectives or uncovering gaps in others' views

·         Arguing another side: However, Scholar A seems to have overlooked [present alternative perspective].

·         Uncovering values: If Scholars A and B had also taken [gap in thinking] into consideration, they may have reached a different conclusion.